Nice 
Same color choice as me!
1 Like
Ahah yeah !
I wanted White buttons on a whole black shell, but it’s wasn’t available somehow - guess I’ll try to 3D print it when I can 
So what’s your game going to be?
OMG I just noticed you ported Blobby Volley to calculator! It’s my favorite libre game. Haven’t you been thinking about porting it on Pokitto? I think it would be a great start project, plus a very fun game. There is enough buttons to even have a “local multiplayer”, right? However the ergonomics would have to be tested
1 Like
Oh yes, I loved that game and it’s simple enough to remake!
However I don’t see how it can be done properly.
I think I’d need an external button, because I need 6 inputs: 2 for moving right and left, and 1 for jumping. C isn’t an option as it interacts with LEFT and RIGHT for the volume.
Using the joypad for two players (P1: LEFT, RIGHT, UP; P2: DOWN, A, B) seems also too complicated.
Otherwise I had to abandon jumping (which would make the game kind of dull), or to make it kind of asymmetrical by, for example, making Player 2 jump when pressing simultaneously the two buttons. I might try that last solution and see if it fits!
Oh I thought you could use C 
It could as well be a singleplayer game with AI, but that would be a little more work and difficulty balancing.
1 Like
If you do the blobby volley conversion, I will take care of providing a multiplayer solution
2 Likes
Always an option:
2 Likes
AI for Blobby Volley should be easy to do, throwing a few math and maybe some RNG. The real fun of BV was always multiplayer tho, soooo…
Ahah that’d take out some fun if you did, as you’re much more skilled than I am!
For the external button, yeah it’s very simple, yet it’s still a requirement that might not be fulfilled in every situation -like riding a train. So as much as possible, I’d like to make games that only use what the Pokitto provide by default, and then extend them with PEX.
But I got to do it to know best anyway!
As a side note, is there any attempt to establish reliable communication between two pokitto, like the old link cable for the gameboy and so? Unless I buy another one that won’t work much for me, but making it kind of standard (as an optional module from the Pokitto API) could open the following things:
- Emulating multiples Pokitto and let them talk for testing by showing both, using differents threads and mapping more keys/controller buttons.
- Could be great for education package, as they’re going to have multiple Pokitto already!
- Of course, multiplayer games / musics apps!
As of C++11 you’ve got a whole array of engines to chose from :P
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random
This is why we really need to invest in some hats.
If there was a standardised “extra button” hat then you could just tell people “requires the extra button hat” instead of giving them a wiring diagram.
I started trying to connect my Pokitto to an Arduino board but didn’t get around to ordering the 3.3v to 5v bridge.
I have got a spare board so I might just go for it and risk the potential damage, but I’d rather not waste my spare board if I can avoid it.
(Aparently some of the pins are 5v tolerant, but some aren’t, and some are but only under certain circumstances. I’ll check the document again sometime, but it was very confusing.)
I could try to develop something on my spare board, but it doesn’t have a screen so I’d be flying blind (and I’m not sure how well it would run without the screen - it might end up waiting for a response from the screen that never comes).
I hope to acquire a second Pokitto soonish, so maybe I’ll investigate something then.
Really it should be as simple as hooking up N input pins to N output pins.
The trick is picking the right pins (I believe there’s a way to treat multiple pins as a single parallel unit),
and then selecting/devising a decent communication system.
(If I can find some decent docs I might even be able to base it on the GB/GBA link cable.)
1 Like
Ahhh don’t worry, I’m started using to those engines and distributions for a bit less than a year haha thanks anyway!
Yeah hats definitely deserve time to invest into!
Ah right, that could become handy to try with an arduino first! You could maybe use the debugger for running on the other board? but I don’t know if that’d would even start this way
1 Like
Welcome. I am looking forward to your concepts!
1 Like
It… does? I never noticed this. It’s a PokittoLib feature? o_O
Maybe change it so the back button (below the reset button) adjusts volume, then you’re free to use the C button.
1 Like
I hope I won’t disappoint!
Well according to the poster it’s the case!
Maybe it changed and the poster wasn’t updated. I assumed it was somehow hard-wired because its presence on a poster makes it kind of permanent?
2 Likes
I’ve looked into them a lot but haven’t actually used them yet.
Oddly I find that I don’t often need random numbers.
I’m tempted to start a thread for hat ideas.
If I had more 3D printing knowledge then I’d try to develop a simple hat.
I’d need to get a debugger cable first,
and I’d probably end up connecting the debugger to the PEX rather than the ports at the back, so it might not be ideal.
I’ll find a way to test someday.
It would be interesting to know if Pokitto boards can run ‘headless’ without modifying the library.
This surprised me to, I discovered it when I was looking into ways to improve the Button library for a v2 of the PokittoLib.
Nope, it’s done in software.
3 Likes
great idea
3 Likes
To clarify, the ‘Flash’ button (as it is labelled on the poster, what FManga calls the ‘back’ button),
does it currently only do something if you hold it down while turning the Pokitto on?
I.e. it won’t do anything if you randomly press or tap it while the Pokitto is on?
Because I know tapping ‘Reset’ will put the Pokitto into USB mode.
The only downside I can see to this is if someone tries to adjust the sound but hits ‘Reset’ by mistake.
But it might be worth it.
Funny story: originally I thought ‘C’ was going to be like a ‘home’ button and thought we couldn’t use it in our programs.
Which brings me to one last question: why is it called ‘C’ and not ‘Start’ or ‘Select’?
1 Like
Ah, I didn’t know it had a name. 
I’ve been using it as a select button in the gameboy emulator, hasn’t caused any problems… though hitting reset accidentally is a risk.
1 Like
I intended to use the C button solely as a SELECT/PAUSE one.
If it depends on the library, I’d suggest making it the default behavior, and hijack it with a #define. That way we can have the freedom to handle the volume in our own menu systems, and use that button for other things.
Sooo I guess the control scheme for the Blobby Volley game could be the following:
2 Players:
- LEFT/RIGHT - Move Player 1’s Blob.
- UP - Make Player 1’s Blob jump.
- B/A - Move Player 2’s Blob.
- C - Make Player 2’s Blob jump.
- DOWN - Game Pause/Menu (that’d might have to be strongly) with a nice scroll-down transition.
Game Pause:
- UP at the top - Resume Game with a nice scroll-up transition.
- UP/DOWN - Select Item
- A - Select Option
- LEFT-RIGHT - Change current Option’s value.
Hmm yeah, I think I can see this better now. Also could be used for more local-multip games actually. Will still try the A-then-B or B-then-A to jump just for fun
(Also having a weird idea of doing a kind of finger twister but that might end up breaking the pokitto haha)
If we ever get round to having a v2 of the library (which I hope we do) then I’d like all settings to be defined by a class/struct type that’s passed as a template argument to the library.
That way to alter the settings you create a new struct/class that inherits the original set with a few modifications.
E.g.
// Library code
namespace Pokitto
{
struct DefaultSettings
{
static constexpr VolumeBehaviour volumeBehaviour = VolumeBehaviour::CAndLeftOrRight;
static constexpr GraphicsMode graphicsMode = GraphicsMode::Hires;
// etc
};
}
// User Code
struct MySettings : public Pokitt::DefaultSettings
{
static constexpr VolumeBehaviour volumeBehaviour = VolumeBehaviour::None;
};
using Core = Pokitto::Core<MySettings>;
using Core::Display;
using Core::Buttons;
Much more flexible, and it’s done at the language level instead of the preprocessor level.
You can even static_assert for invalid settings.
1 Like
Ah yes, of course templates would be a great things to do for that!